🔗 Share this article

One of the most recognizable images from the twentieth century shows a naked girl, her hands outstretched, her features twisted in pain, her skin blistered and raw. She is fleeing towards the lens while escaping a bombing within South Vietnam. Beside her, youngsters also run from the bombed community of the region, amid a backdrop of dark smoke along with military personnel.

This Global Effect from a Single Picture

Shortly after the publication in June 1972, this picture—originally called The Terror of War—became an analog phenomenon. Witnessed and discussed by millions, it's widely credited with motivating worldwide views opposing the US war in Southeast Asia. A prominent thinker later observed that this deeply lasting photograph of the child the girl in distress possibly had a greater impact to fuel global outrage toward the conflict than lengthy broadcasts of shown violence. A renowned British photojournalist who documented the fighting described it the single best photograph of what would later be called the televised conflict. Another experienced photojournalist declared how the photograph is simply put, among the most significant photos in history, especially from that conflict.

The Decades-Long Attribution Followed by a New Allegation

For 53 years, the image was assigned to Nick Út, a young local photojournalist on assignment for a major news agency during the war. But a controversial recent documentary streaming on a streaming service claims which states the well-known picture—long considered as the peak of photojournalism—was actually taken by a different man at the location in the village.

As claimed by the documentary, the iconic image may have been captured by an independent photographer, who sold his work to the organization. The allegation, and its following inquiry, stems from a former editor an ex-staffer, who claims that the powerful editor directed the staff to change the photograph's attribution from the stringer to Nick Út, the one employed photographer there that day.

This Search for the Truth

Robinson, advanced in years, contacted one of the journalists recently, asking for assistance in finding the unnamed photographer. He mentioned how, if he was still living, he hoped to give an apology. The journalist reflected on the freelance photographers he knew—likening them to current independents, who, like Vietnamese freelancers during the war, are routinely overlooked. Their efforts is often doubted, and they function under much more difficult circumstances. They lack insurance, no long-term security, they don’t have support, they often don’t have proper gear, making them incredibly vulnerable when documenting in familiar settings.

The journalist wondered: How would it feel to be the individual who made this image, should it be true that Nick Út didn’t take it?” As an image-maker, he imagined, it would be deeply distressing. As a student of war photography, especially the highly regarded war photography of the era, it might be reputation-threatening, maybe career-damaging. The revered history of the image in the diaspora was so strong that the creator whose parents emigrated during the war felt unsure to take on the investigation. He expressed, “I didn’t want to unsettle the established story that credited Nick the photograph. I also feared to disturb the status quo among a group that consistently respected this accomplishment.”

The Investigation Progresses

However both the filmmaker and the creator agreed: it was important raising the issue. As members of the press are to keep the world responsible,” said one, it is essential that we can address tough issues about our own field.”

The documentary documents the team in their pursuit of their research, from discussions with witnesses, to call-outs in today's the city, to reviewing records from other footage taken that day. Their search finally produce a name: Nguyễn Thành Nghệ, a driver for a news network at the time who sometimes worked as a stringer to foreign agencies as a freelancer. As shown, a moved Nghệ, like others advanced in age and living in the United States, states that he handed over the image to the AP for minimal payment and a print, only to be plagued by not being acknowledged for decades.

The Backlash and Additional Scrutiny

He is portrayed in the footage, quiet and calm, but his story became incendiary in the field of photojournalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to